Tag Archives: women in STEM

On India’s new ‘Vigyan Puraskar’ awards

The Government of India has replaced the 300 or so awards for scientists it used to give out until this year with the Rashtriya Vigyan Puraskar (RVP), a set of four awards with 56 laureates, The Hindu has reported. Unlike … Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on On India’s new ‘Vigyan Puraskar’ awards

A well-meaning manel is not a good panel

It’s time the good intentions of the organisers cease to matter. Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Science | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on A well-meaning manel is not a good panel

Gender equity in retractions

From the abstract of a fascinating study published in PLoS ONE on May 3, 2023: … this study investigated gender differences in authorship of retracted papers in biomedical sciences available on RetractionWatch. Among 35,635 biomedical articles retracted between 1970 and … Continue reading

Posted in Analysis, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Gender equity in retractions

Some science prizes are only for men

Say Someone has won the Nobel Prize for physics, perhaps the most prestigious honour (as awards go) for a physicist. What would it mean for all the future awards given to this Someone? One thing that a Nobel Prize does, … Continue reading

Posted in Analysis, Culture, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Some science prizes are only for men

The Nobel intent

You’ve probably tired of this but I can’t. The Nobel Prize folks just sent out a newsletter ahead of Women’s Day, on March 8, describing the achievements of female laureates of each of the six prizes. This is a customary … Continue reading

Posted in Science | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Nobel intent

Social media and science communication

The following article was originally intended for an Indian publication but I withdrew from the commission because I couldn’t rework the piece according to changes they required, mostly for lack of focus. I thank Karnika Kohli and Shruti Muralidhar for … Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds, Scicomm | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Social media and science communication

Two sides of the road and the gutter next to it

I have a mid-October deadline for an essay so obviously when I started reading up on the topic this morning, I ended up on a different part of the web – where I found this: a piece by a journalist … Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Op-eds | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Two sides of the road and the gutter next to it

Limitations of the Finkbeiner test

This post was republished on The Wire on January 8, 2018. The Finkbeiner test, named for science writer Ann Finkbeiner, was created to check whether a profile of a female scientist published by a mainstream news outlet was produced in the … Continue reading

Posted in Life notes, Scicomm | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Limitations of the Finkbeiner test

Why do we cover the Nobel Prize announcements?

The Nobel Prizes are too big to fail. Even if they’ve become beset by a host of problems, such as: Long gap between invention/discovery and recognition, A large cash component given to old scientists, Limiting number of awardees to three, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Why do we cover the Nobel Prize announcements?

Some thoughts on the Mack/Dorigo Twitter exchange, and Zivkovic, Feyerabend, etc.

Aspirants flock to role models. The ‘underlying human’ must not jeopardise their conversation by being a dick. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Some thoughts on the Mack/Dorigo Twitter exchange, and Zivkovic, Feyerabend, etc.