Tag Archives: The Guardian

“Who are we?”

From ‘‘The physics community has never split like this’: row erupts over plans for new Large Hadron Collider’, The Guardian, March 29, 2025: However, if the FCC were given the go-ahead, it could lock up funds for decades and end … Continue reading

Posted in Analysis, Science | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on “Who are we?”

“Enough science.”

Edit, 6.04 pm, December 15, 2020: A reader pointed out to me that The Guardian may in fact have been joking, and it has been known to be flippant on occasion. If this is really the case, I pronounce myself … Continue reading

Posted in Science | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on “Enough science.”

Dehumanising language during an outbreak

It appears the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has begun local transmission in India, i.e. infecting more people within the country instead of each new patient having recently travelled to an already affected country. The advent of local transmission is an important event … Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds, Scicomm, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Dehumanising language during an outbreak

Cognitive flexibility and nationalism 2.0

Remember that paper about cognitive flexibility and nationalism? The one that said people who are more nationalistic in their politics tend to have lower cognitive flexibility? I’d blogged about it here. I hadn’t read the study’s paper, published in the Proceedings of the … Continue reading

Posted in Scicomm | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Cognitive flexibility and nationalism 2.0

Auditing science stories: Two examples from the bottom rungs

The worst kinds of science stories are those that get facts wrong – and then those that report null results wrong. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Auditing science stories: Two examples from the bottom rungs