Tag Archives: scientific research

Avoiding ‘muddled science’ in the newsroom

On April 23, I was part of a webinar called ProtoCall, organised by Pro.to with the support of International Centre for Journalists and the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative. It happens once a week and is hosted by Ameya Nagarajan and … Continue reading

Posted in Scicomm, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Avoiding ‘muddled science’ in the newsroom

Freeman Dyson’s PhD

The physicist, thinker and writer Freeman Dyson passed away on February 28, 2020, at the age of 96. I wrote his obituary for The Wire Science; excerpt: The 1965 Nobel Prize for the development of [quantum electrodynamics] excluded Dyson. … … Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Freeman Dyson’s PhD

The scientist as inadvertent loser

Twice this week, I’d had occasion to write about how science is an immutably human enterprise and therefore some of its loftier ideals are aspirational at best, and about how transparency is one of the chief USPs of preprint repositories … Continue reading

Posted in Analysis, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The scientist as inadvertent loser

The chrysalis that isn’t there

I wrote the following post while listening to this track. Perhaps you will enjoy reading it to the same sounds. Otherwise, please consider it a whimsical recommendation. 🙂 I should really start keeping a log of different stories in the … Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The chrysalis that isn’t there

A science for the non-1%

David Michaels, an epidemiologist and a former US assistant secretary of labour for occupational safety and health under Barack Obama, writes in the Boston Review: [Product defence] operations have on their payrolls—or can bring in on a moment’s notice—toxicologists, epidemiologists, … Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A science for the non-1%

The not-so-obvious obvious

If your job requires you to pore through a dozen or two scientific papers every month – as mine does – you’ll start to notice a few every now and then couching a somewhat well-known fact in study-speak. I don’t … Continue reading

Posted in Scicomm, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The not-so-obvious obvious

How science is presented and consumed on Facebook

This post is a breakdown of the Pew study titled The Science People See on Social Media, published March 21, 2018. Without further ado… In an effort to better understand the science information that social media users encounter on these … Continue reading

Posted in Life notes, Scicomm | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on How science is presented and consumed on Facebook

By the way: the Chekhov’s gun and the science article

“If in the first act you have hung a pistol on the wall, then in the following one it should be fired. Otherwise don’t put it there.” (source) This is the principle of the Chekhov’s gun: that all items within … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on By the way: the Chekhov’s gun and the science article

Cybersecurity in space

Physical access to an internet-enabled object is no longer necessary to mess with it. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Cybersecurity in space

Vanilla entertainment

One of the first, and most important in hindsight, bits of advice I got from the journalist Siddharth Varadarajan was about how to choose what to write: “Write what you’d like to read” (Dan Fagin would later add the important … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Vanilla entertainment