Tag Archives: scientific papers

The identity of scientific papers

This prompt arose in response to Stuart Ritchie’s response to a suggestion in an editorial “first published last year but currently getting some attention on Twitter” – that scientists should write their scientific papers as if they were telling a … Continue reading

Posted in Scicomm, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The identity of scientific papers

The language and bullshitness of 'a nearly unreadable paper'

Earlier today, the Retraction Watch mailing list highlighted a strange paper written by a V.M. Das disputing the widely accepted fact that our body clocks are regulated by the gene-level circadian rhythm. The paper is utter bullshit. Sample its breathless … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The language and bullshitness of 'a nearly unreadable paper'

The language and bullshitness of ‘a nearly unreadable paper’

Earlier today, the Retraction Watch mailing list highlighted a strange paper written by a V.M. Das disputing the widely accepted fact that our body clocks are regulated by the gene-level circadian rhythm. The paper is utter bullshit. Sample its breathless … Continue reading

Posted in Life notes, Scicomm | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The language and bullshitness of ‘a nearly unreadable paper’