Tag Archives: science journalism

Scicommers as knowledge producers

Reading the latest edition of Raghavendra Gadagkar’s column in The Wire Science, ‘More Fun Than Fun’, about how scientists should become communicators and communicators should be treated as knowledge-producers, I began wondering if the knowledge produced by the latter is … Continue reading

Posted in Scicomm | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Scicommers as knowledge producers

Anti-softening science for the state

The group of ministers (GoM) report on “government communication” has recommended that the government promote “soft topics” in the media like “yoga” and “tigers”. We can only speculate what this means, and that shouldn’t be hard. The overall spirit of … Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds, Scicomm, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Anti-softening science for the state

The commentariot

The following post is an orange flag – a quieter alarm raised in anticipation of something worse that hasn’t transpired yet but is likely in the offing. Earlier today, at the end of a call with a scientist for a … Continue reading

Posted in Scicomm | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The commentariot

A Q&A about my job and science journalism

A couple weeks ago, some students from a university in South India got in touch to ask a few questions about my job and about science communication. The correspondence was entirely over email, and I’m pasting it in full below … Continue reading

Posted in Scicomm | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Q&A about my job and science journalism

Why scientists should read more

The amount of communicative effort to describe the fact of a ball being thrown is vanishingly low. It’s as simple as saying, “X threw the ball.” It takes a bit more effort to describe how an internal combustion engine works … Continue reading

Posted in Scicomm | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Why scientists should read more

Clarity and soundness

I feel a lot of non-science editors just switch off when they read science stuff. A friend told me this earlier today, during yet another conversation about how many of the editorial issues that assail science and health journalism have … Continue reading

Posted in Scicomm | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Clarity and soundness

Journalistic entropy

Say you need to store a square image 1,000 pixels wide to a side with the smallest filesize (setting aside compression techniques). The image begins with the colour #009900 on the left side and, as you move towards the right, … Continue reading

Posted in Analysis, Scicomm | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Journalistic entropy

Poor journalism is making it harder for preprints

There have been quite a few statements by various scientists on Twitter who, in pointing to some preprint paper’s untenable claims, point to the manuscript’s identity as a preprint paper as well. This is not fair, as I’ve argued many times before. … Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Poor journalism is making it harder for preprints

In conversation with Sree Srinivasan

On May 1, I was hosted on a webinar by the American journalist Sree Srinivasan, along with Anna Isaac of The News Minute and Arunabh Saikia of Scroll.in. As part of his daily show on the COVID-19 crisis, hosted by Scroll.in, Srinivasan hosts a … Continue reading

Posted in Op-eds, Scicomm | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on In conversation with Sree Srinivasan

The journalist as expert

I recently turned down some requests for interviews because the topics of discussion in each case indicated that I would be treated as a scientist, not a science journalist (something that happened shortly after the Balakot airstrikes and the ASAT … Continue reading

Posted in Analysis, Scicomm, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The journalist as expert