Tag Archives: PeerJ
PeerJ’s peer-review problem
Of all the scientific journals in the wild, there are a few I keep a closer eye on: they publish interesting results but more importantly they have been forward-thinking on matters of scientific publishing and they’ve also displayed a tendency … Continue reading
Posted in Science
Tagged glamour journals, negative results, peer review, PeerJ, preprint papers, scientific publishing, sound science
Comments Off on PeerJ’s peer-review problem