Poor journalism is making it harder for preprints
There have been quite a few statements by various scientists on Twitter
peer review
Distracting from the peer-review problem
From an article entitled ‘The risks of swiftly spreading coronavirus research‘ published
A trumpet for Ramdev
The Print published an article entitled ‘Ramdev’s Patanjali does a ‘first’
The scientist as inadvertent loser
Twice this week, I’d had occasion to write about how science
To see faces where there are none
This week in “neither university press offices nor prestigious journals know what
The cycle
Is it just me or does everyone see a self-fulfilling prophecy here?
Confused thoughts on embargoes
Seventy! That’s how many observatories around the world turned their antennae
A conference's peer-review was found to be sort of random, but whose fault is it?
It’s not a good time for peer-review. Sure, if you’ve
R&D in China and India
“A great deal of the debate over globalization of knowledge economies has
Replication studies, ceiling effects, and the psychology of science
On May 25, I found Erika Salomon’s tweet:
Excellent comment thread
