Tag Archives: Nambu-Goldstone bosons

The symmetry incarnations

This post was originally published on October 6, 2012. I recently rediscovered it and decided to republish it with a few updates. Geometric symmetry in nature is often a sign of unperturbedness, as if nothing has interfered with a natural … Continue reading

Posted in Scicomm | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The symmetry incarnations

Yoichiro Nambu, the silent revolutionary of particle physics, is dead

The Wire July 18, 2015 Particle physics is an obscure subject for most people but everyone sat up and took notice when the Large Hadron Collider discovered the particle named after Peter Higgs in 2012. The Higgs boson propelled his name to the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Yoichiro Nambu, the silent revolutionary of particle physics, is dead

Where does the Higgs boson come from?

When the Chelyabinsk meteor – dubbed Chebarkul – entered Earth’s atmosphere at around 17 km/s, it started to heat up due to friction. After a point, cracks already present on the chunk of rock weighing 9,000-tonnes became licensed to widen and eventually … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Where does the Higgs boson come from?

The Symmetry Incarnations – Part I

Symmetry in nature is a sign of unperturbedness. It means nothing has interfered with a natural process, and that its effects at each step are simply scaled-up or scaled-down versions of each other. For this reason, symmetry is aesthetically pleasing, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Symmetry Incarnations – Part I

A simplification of superfluidity

“Once people tell me what symmetry the system starts with and what symmetry it ends up with, and whether the broken symmetries can be interchanged, I can work out exactly how many bosons there are and if that leads to … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on A simplification of superfluidity