Tag Archives: modern science

Ayurveda is not a science – but what does that mean?

This post has benefited immensely with inputs from Om Prasad. Calling something ‘not a science’ has become a pejorative, an insult. You say Ayurveda is not a science and suddenly, its loudest supporters demand to know what the problem is, … Continue reading

Posted in Analysis, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Ayurveda is not a science – but what does that mean?

An Upanishadic lesson for modern science?

Do the Bhagavad Gita and the Upanishads lack the “baggage of biography” – to borrow Amit Chaudhuri’s words – because we don’t know who the authors, outside of the mythology, are or – as Chaudhuri writes in a new essay … Continue reading

Posted in Analysis, Culture, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on An Upanishadic lesson for modern science?

The chrysalis that isn’t there

I wrote the following post while listening to this track. Perhaps you will enjoy reading it to the same sounds. Otherwise, please consider it a whimsical recommendation. 🙂 I should really start keeping a log of different stories in the … Continue reading

Posted in Culture, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The chrysalis that isn’t there