Tag Archives: double-blind peer-review
A Kuhnian gap between research publishing and academic success
There is a gap in research publishing and how it relates to academic success. On the one hand, there are scientists complaining of low funds, being short-staffed, low-quality or absent equipment, disoptimal employment/tenure terms, bureaucratic incompetence and political interference. On … Continue reading
Posted in Science
Tagged double-blind peer-review, journal impact factor, paradigm change, peer review, research evaluation, scientometrics, status bias, Thomas Kuhn
Comments Off on A Kuhnian gap between research publishing and academic success
A conference’s peer-review was found to be sort of random, but whose fault is it?
It’s not a good time for peer-review. Sure, if you’ve been a regular reader of Retraction Watch, it’s never been a good time for peer-review. But aside from that, the process has increasingly been taking the brunt for not being … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged arbitrariness, conditional probability, Corinna Cortes, double-blind peer-review, National Institutes of Health, Neil Lawrence, Neural Information Processing Systems conference, peer review, Retraction Watch, scientific publishing
Comments Off on A conference’s peer-review was found to be sort of random, but whose fault is it?